Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Particular\s+behavior\s+in\s+4\s+nodes\s+setup\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] Particular behavior in 4 nodes setup (score: 1)
Author: Filipe Cifali <cifali.filipe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:38:58 -0300
The traffic flows from director to MX servers, then the MX servers take the connection for themselves. They are all VMs deployed from the same template. Still, I keep getting this strange behavior...
/html/lvs-users/2013-04/msg00021.html (11,117 bytes)

2. Re: [lvs-users] Particular behavior in 4 nodes setup (score: 1)
Author: Filipe Cifali <cifali.filipe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:44:29 -0300
I'll check, I should use ipvsadm -c --rate --stats to see how te traffic flows? I set them as gateway and the 2 nodes that are active fully work w/o problems. 2013/4/23 Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxx
/html/lvs-users/2013-04/msg00004.html (10,015 bytes)

3. Re: [lvs-users] Particular behavior in 4 nodes setup (score: 1)
Author: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:05:11 +0100
It sounds like a variant of the "ARP problem". Is the traffic going directly to the MX servers, rather than through the director? Graeme _______________________________________________ Please read th
/html/lvs-users/2013-04/msg00003.html (8,743 bytes)

4. [lvs-users] Particular behavior in 4 nodes setup (score: 1)
Author: Filipe Cifali <cifali.filipe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:09:38 -0300
Hello guys, I have this setup: IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn TCP mx-vip-01:25 wrr -> mx-
/html/lvs-users/2013-04/msg00002.html (9,074 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu