- 1. Re: [lvs-users] Particular behavior in 4 nodes setup (score: 1)
- Author: Filipe Cifali <cifali.filipe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:38:58 -0300
- The traffic flows from director to MX servers, then the MX servers take the connection for themselves. They are all VMs deployed from the same template. Still, I keep getting this strange behavior...
- /html/lvs-users/2013-04/msg00021.html (11,117 bytes)
- 2. Re: [lvs-users] Particular behavior in 4 nodes setup (score: 1)
- Author: Filipe Cifali <cifali.filipe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:44:29 -0300
- I'll check, I should use ipvsadm -c --rate --stats to see how te traffic flows? I set them as gateway and the 2 nodes that are active fully work w/o problems. 2013/4/23 Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxx
- /html/lvs-users/2013-04/msg00004.html (10,015 bytes)
- 3. Re: [lvs-users] Particular behavior in 4 nodes setup (score: 1)
- Author: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:05:11 +0100
- It sounds like a variant of the "ARP problem". Is the traffic going directly to the MX servers, rather than through the director? Graeme _______________________________________________ Please read th
- /html/lvs-users/2013-04/msg00003.html (8,743 bytes)
- 4. [lvs-users] Particular behavior in 4 nodes setup (score: 1)
- Author: Filipe Cifali <cifali.filipe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:09:38 -0300
- Hello guys, I have this setup: IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn TCP mx-vip-01:25 wrr -> mx-
- /html/lvs-users/2013-04/msg00002.html (9,074 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu