Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Problem\s+with\s+ldirectord\s+Bug\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Problem\s+with\s+ldirectord\s+Bug\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] Problem with ldirectord Bug? (score: 1): Author: Ben Cabot <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:52:02 +0100; Thanks Julian. I have just tested the latest ipvsadm and it works as expected. Regards -- LOADBALANCER.ORG LTD. www.loadbalancer.org support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _________________________________________; /html/lvs-users/2014-06/msg00005.html (11,096 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] Problem with ldirectord Bug? (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 23:14:53 +0300 (EEST); Hello, So, it is a problem with the utility. Can someone check by downloading and compiling latest ipvsadm: git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/kernel/ipvsadm/ipvsadm.git libipvs/libipvs.c h; /html/lvs-users/2014-06/msg00004.html (10,292 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] Problem with ldirectord Bug? (score: 1): Author: Ben Cabot <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 10:16:52 +0100; Julian, Running cat /proc/net/ip_vs gives the correct output. IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActC; /html/lvs-users/2014-06/msg00003.html (12,592 bytes)
4. Re: [lvs-users] Problem with ldirectord Bug? (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 10:16:12 +0300 (EEST); Hello, Do you see the same with this command?: cat /proc/net/ip_vs Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting; /html/lvs-users/2014-06/msg00002.html (11,418 bytes)
5. Re: [lvs-users] Problem with ldirectord Bug? (score: 1): Author: Ben Cabot <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 11:23:10 +0100; I've seen the same thing, It looks like ipvsadm is not displaying the details from lvs correctly. However looking at a packet capture you can see it is sending traffic to all servers. [root@ip-10-0-1; /html/lvs-users/2014-06/msg00001.html (15,689 bytes)
6. [lvs-users] Problem with ldirectord Bug? (score: 1): Author: Migue Martin <miguegt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 11:38:14 +0200; Hi all. I'm having a problem with ldirectord that I can not solve, I comment my situation: The problem is in the ipvsadm only show a one real IP, when i configured two now, show the ldirector.cf: roo; /html/lvs-users/2014-06/msg00000.html (12,030 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]