- 1. Re: [lvs-users] Session "persistence" issues (score: 1)
- Author: Elliott Barrere <elliott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:00:56 -0700
- Thanks Malcolm, that's great. I am a little curious why that isn't the default, since it seems less common that someone would go to the trouble of managing the table through userspace, but what do I
- /html/lvs-users/2014-09/msg00008.html (13,220 bytes)
- 2. Re: [lvs-users] Session "persistence" issues (score: 1)
- Author: Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:43:22 +0100
- Elliot, Their are a couple of mechanisms to handle this, the behaviour that you probably want is: net.ipv4.vs.expire_nodest_conn=1 expire the entry in table immediately and inform client that connect
- /html/lvs-users/2014-09/msg00007.html (11,608 bytes)
- 3. Re: [lvs-users] Session "persistence" issues (score: 1)
- Author: Elliott Barrere <elliott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:08:06 -0700
- It appears my link was stripped. The configuration is described here: http://gcharriere.com/blog/?p=339 elliott barrere | 206.351.3520 _______________________________________________ Please read the
- /html/lvs-users/2014-09/msg00006.html (11,674 bytes)
- 4. [lvs-users] Session "persistence" issues (score: 1)
- Author: Elliott Barrere <elliott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:04:40 -0700
- Hi guys - I'm having an issue with a 2-node setup (similar setup to what's described here) where established sessions to a particular real server don't fail over when that real server fails. That is,
- /html/lvs-users/2014-09/msg00005.html (10,318 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu