Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Sorry\,\s+it\'s\s+pretty\s+unusable\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Sorry\,\s+it\'s\s+pretty\s+unusable\!\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] Sorry, it's pretty unusable! (score: 1): Author: Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <dennisml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:33:57 +0200; I'm not sure I understand how DR does away with the SPOF in a way that NAT doesn't. AFAICT the both behave the same way and require to be made redundant to not be a SPOF no? With overhead are you ref; /html/lvs-users/2013-10/msg00018.html (13,034 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] Sorry, it's pretty unusable! (score: 1): Author: Michael Schwartzkopff <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:21:47 +0200; Am Donnerstag, 17. Oktober 2013, 08:48:23 schrieb Ulrich Windl: OK. <Dear reader: please insert your own thoughts here> How did you get the implression that it does not work for many others? The reas; /html/lvs-users/2013-10/msg00017.html (11,602 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] Sorry, it's pretty unusable! (score: 1): Author: Tom van Leeuwen <tom.van.leeuwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:22:20 +0200; So he may not be receiving your reply. Ulrich if you want source nat on your LVS box, you'll have to do: 1) Create a loadbalancer: ipvsadm -A -t 192.168.200.100:443 2) Create the source nat rule for; /html/lvs-users/2013-10/msg00016.html (13,705 bytes)
4. Re: [lvs-users] Sorry, it's pretty unusable! (score: 1): Author: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:51:39 +0100; Hi On 17 Oct 2013, at 07:48, "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Yes we did, but if people reply to the list then you won't see it unless you're watching an archiver somewhere..; /html/lvs-users/2013-10/msg00015.html (11,350 bytes)
5. [lvs-users] Sorry, it's pretty unusable! (score: 1): Author: "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 08:48:23 +0200; Hi! I'm not subscribed to the list, so I hope someone will receive it anyway: I could pretty well use LVS for a load-balance, high-availability scenario like distributing SMTP requests to different s; /html/lvs-users/2013-10/msg00014.html (10,666 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]