Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Using\s+LVS\s+for\s+load\s+balance\s+gateway\/router\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Using\s+LVS\s+for\s+load\s+balance\s+gateway\/router\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [lvs-users] Using LVS for load balance gateway/router (score: 1): Author: sboichakov@xxxxxxxxx ( ); Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:44:05 +0300; How I tested: - setup fwmark service for 1234 mark in ip_vs on router - add prerouting rule for marking packets if they dst addr == 8.8.8.8 (why not 8.8.8.8 xD?) - enable net.ipv4.ip_forward (set 1); /html/lvs-users/2016-04/msg00005.html (12,628 bytes)
2. [lvs-users] Using LVS for load balance gateway/router (score: 1): Author: sboichakov@xxxxxxxxx ( ); Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:29:41 +0300; Now we using ip_vs from linux 4.3, but I have no limitations on the choice of version. I also tested my configuration on linux 4.5 kernel. 2016-04-04 16:12 GMT+03:00 Alex Lopez <alxmlpz at gmail.com>; /html/lvs-users/2016-04/msg00004.html (11,668 bytes)
3. [lvs-users] Using LVS for load balance gateway/router (score: 1): Author: alxmlpz@xxxxxxxxx (Alex Lopez); Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:12:49 -0300; What version of lvs are u using? Sent from my iPhone; /html/lvs-users/2016-04/msg00003.html (10,508 bytes)
4. [lvs-users] Using LVS for load balance gateway/router (score: 1): Author: sboichakov@xxxxxxxxx ( ); Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 14:04:19 +0300; Thanks! We already using keepalived as director for VRRP and IP_VS. But the problem is how to configure daemon for load balance *forwarding* traffic, or how setup this configuration without keepalive; /html/lvs-users/2016-04/msg00002.html (9,416 bytes)
5. Re: [lvs-users] Using LVS for load balance gateway/router (score: 1): Author: "Ebrahimpour, Khosrow (SSC/SPC)" <khosrow.ebrahimpour@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:58:55 +0000; Hi, Have you looked at "keepalived"? It acts as an lvs director, but also provides high availability via VRRP. _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before pos; /html/lvs-users/2016-03/msg00007.html (11,738 bytes)
6. Re: [lvs-users] Using LVS for load balance gateway/router (score: 1): Author: <sboichakov@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:40:55 +0300; Thanks for advice Michael! But after research this technology, I have decided that it is not suitable for our problem. PBR is suitable for static (24/7) routers with 2 ISP canals, but it is not so. W; /html/lvs-users/2016-03/msg00006.html (10,041 bytes)
7. Re: [lvs-users] Using LVS for load balance gateway/router (score: 1): Author: Michael Schwartzkopff <ms@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:28:47 +0100; Am Donnerstag, 24. März 2016, 16:17:25 schrieb : Better use Policy Based Routing for upstream traffic. See Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control (LARTC) for the documentation. http://www.lartc.o; /html/lvs-users/2016-03/msg00004.html (9,949 bytes)
8. [lvs-users] Using LVS for load balance gateway/router (score: 1): Author: <sboichakov@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:17:25 +0300; Hello, guys. Is possible to use LVS for load balance forwarding traffic in GNU/Linux ? -- With best regards, Sboychakov Dmitry _______________________________________________ Please read the document; /html/lvs-users/2016-03/msg00003.html (9,334 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]