Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+depoly\s+lvs\s+on\s+only\s+one\s+host\s+for\s+several\s+process\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+depoly\s+lvs\s+on\s+only\s+one\s+host\s+for\s+several\s+process\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] depoly lvs on only one host for several process (score: 1): Author: net.study.sea@xxxxxxxxx; Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:54:19 +0800; Could you please share the configure shell script ? Thanks a lot! 2014-3-3116:23Tomas Carnecky <tomas.carnecky@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation; /html/lvs-users/2014-04/msg00016.html (11,753 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] depoly lvs on only one host for several process (score: 1): Author: Hatt Tom <net.study.sea@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 12:54:50 +0800; could you please share the lvs configure shell script with me ? thanks a lot 2014-03-31 16:23 GMT+08:00 Tomas Carnecky <tomas.carnecky@xxxxxxxxx>: -- Best Regards! ___________________________________; /html/lvs-users/2014-04/msg00012.html (11,549 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] depoly lvs on only one host for several process (score: 1): Author: Hatt Tom <net.study.sea@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 20:12:02 +0800; how to Setting weight to 0? 2014-04-01 19:44 GMT+08:00 Patrick Schaaf <netdev@xxxxxx>: -- Best Regards! _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting -; /html/lvs-users/2014-04/msg00003.html (10,986 bytes)
4. Re: [lvs-users] depoly lvs on only one host for several process (score: 1): Author: Patrick Schaaf <netdev@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 13:44:46 +0200; I think you can safely just remove the realserver, and still existing connections will keep working until they terminate. Setting weight to 0 still makes sense when you want to temporarily take a rea; /html/lvs-users/2014-04/msg00002.html (9,752 bytes)
5. Re: [lvs-users] depoly lvs on only one host for several process (score: 1): Author: Tomas Carnecky <tomas.carnecky@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:47:04 +0200; So that new clients won't connect to the old version. Existing connections will continue to work, and once no client is connected to the old version, it can be shut down. The scheduling method is irr; /html/lvs-users/2014-04/msg00001.html (12,183 bytes)
6. Re: [lvs-users] depoly lvs on only one host for several process (score: 1): Author: Hatt Tom <net.study.sea@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 16:40:10 +0800; what is the use of ' set weight of the old version to zero' ? what scheduling mothod do you use ? 2014-03-31 16:23 GMT+08:00 Tomas Carnecky <tomas.carnecky@xxxxxxxxx>: -- Best Regards! ______________; /html/lvs-users/2014-04/msg00000.html (10,252 bytes)
7. Re: [lvs-users] depoly lvs on only one host for several process (score: 1): Author: Tomas Carnecky <tomas.carnecky@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:23:26 +0200; Yes. Run the processes each on its own port (eg. 8000, 8001, 8002, ...) and then add all these ports as real servers. I use this to do seamless upgrades of the application. I start the new version up; /html/lvs-users/2014-03/msg00066.html (9,880 bytes)
8. [lvs-users] depoly lvs on only one host for several process (score: 1): Author: Hatt Tom <net.study.sea@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:27:56 +0800; Hi: Is it possible that deploying lvs cluster on one host to do balance for several process ? -- Best Regards! _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before pos; /html/lvs-users/2014-03/msg00065.html (8,369 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]