Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+full\-nat\s+support\s+in\s+mainline\s+kernel\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+full\-nat\s+support\s+in\s+mainline\s+kernel\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] full-nat support in mainline kernel? (score: 1): Author: Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:44:55 +0100; Von: Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx> the ip_vs netfilter module if you use fullnat method. Well, as you wrote, there it is not merged to mainline (and definitely not available on my not-so-new IPVS ser; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00014.html (10,682 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] full-nat support in mainline kernel? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Bauer <stefan.bauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:18:56 +0100; --Ursprüngliche Nachricht-- Von: Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx> Again, as far as i understood, no reverse proxy is required. It is handled by the ip_vs netfilter module if you use fullnat method. Plea; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00013.html (10,431 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] full-nat support in mainline kernel? (score: 1): Author: Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:22:38 +0100; Von: Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx> From that page: I think my configuration above does exactly this (well, I have omitted "lip" address, using SNAT to a different address instead of MASQUERADE would; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00012.html (12,058 bytes)
4. Re: [lvs-users] full-nat support in mainline kernel? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Bauer <stefan.bauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:43:16 +0100; --Ursprüngliche Nachricht-- Von: Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx> Well, a simple SNAT is what i want but i prefer to get it done by ipvsadm/ip_vs in Kernel. Thats how i understood the implementation by; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00011.html (10,805 bytes)
5. Re: [lvs-users] full-nat support in mainline kernel? (score: 1): Author: ROHAUT Sébastien (EXT GFI) <ext.gfi.sebastien.rohaut@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:56:25 +0100; Hi, I think he's talking about IPVS FULLNAT from this link : http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/IPVS_FULLNAT_and_SYNPROXY Sébastien ROHAUT --Message d'origine-- Hello, Stefan Bauer wrote: [...] i; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00010.html (13,427 bytes)
6. Re: [lvs-users] full-nat support in mainline kernel? (score: 1): Author: Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:49:12 +0100; Hello, [...] i have to do in userland? What do you mean by Full-NAT? Is it similar to what you get when you use a user-space reverse proxy? I have been looking for this a month ago - my real servers; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00009.html (10,109 bytes)
7. [lvs-users] full-nat support in mainline kernel? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Bauer <stefan.bauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 09:59:18 +0100; Hi, according to latest stable kernel and net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c static inline void ip_vs_bind_xmit(struct ip_vs_conn *cp) { switch (IP_VS_FWD_METHOD(cp)) { case IP_VS_CONN_F_MASQ: cp->packe; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00008.html (9,777 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]