Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+so\-called\s+\"one\s+arm\s+NAT\"\s+LVS\-NAT\s+and\s+interaction\s+with\s+netfilter\/iptables\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+so\-called\s+\"one\s+arm\s+NAT\"\s+LVS\-NAT\s+and\s+interaction\s+with\s+netfilter\/iptables\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] so-called "one arm NAT" LVS-NAT and interaction with netfilter/iptables (score: 1): Author: Ivan Havlicek <ivan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:15:13 +0200; Hi, I use also ipvs in NAT mode with some SNAT rules to force traffic go back to client through my ipvs gateway. Note sure, but I guess that in your case, this should work with localhost service. In; /html/lvs-users/2014-06/msg00031.html (9,439 bytes)
2. [lvs-users] so-called "one arm NAT" LVS-NAT and interaction with netfilter/iptables (score: 1): Author: "Masuda, Bond" <Bond_Masuda@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:18:28 +0000; LVS users, I have a "one arm NAT" configuration with so-called "local node" that I'm trying to make work with LVS. I have two servers, syslog servers (call them A and B), and one client (we'll call C; /html/lvs-users/2014-06/msg00029.html (16,332 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]