LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: A question regarding Load Balancer in LVS and the ARP problem

To: David Shwatrz <dshwatrz@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: A question regarding Load Balancer in LVS and the ARP problem
Cc: lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 18:42:51 -0800 (PST)
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007, David Shwatrz wrote:

My question is : suppose I have 2 NICs on each real server. Is there any advantage of configuring the VIP on the loopback device against configuring it on eth1 ? should configuring the VIP on eth1 work ?

In the early days (<=2.2) any device on the realserver was OK for the VIP (eg dummy0, eth1). I haven't checked since then, but all you're looking for is an address that will deliver packets locally. Since then the linux kernel has gotten a lot more anal/precise about such things and much that we used to be able to do in 2.0.x doesn't work anymore and I can't see any reason why the old behaviour was wrong. So it's reasonable to think that eth1 should work, but I haven't checked it for recent kernels


Joe

--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>