Re: [PATCH] Transparent proxy support for LVS with localnode and realser

To: LVS Devel <lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Transparent proxy support for LVS with localnode and realservers (WORKING)
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:44:51 -0800 (PST)
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Raphael Vallazza wrote:

I've attached patches for net-2.6 (works on 2.6.24-2.6.22) and net-2.6.25. I've made some cosmetic/description changes and added a "FORWARD" option that puts LVS into INPUT *and* FORWARD hooks, now the options are: INPUT, FORWARD and PREROUTING. I think that all of these have pros and cons, the user should choose...

I'm absolutely stunned. We've been wanting this for quite a while and no-one has had time to do it. I could see no way it would ever arrive and had kissed it goodbye. Thanks very much

I don't know how much info ip_vs is sending to /proc nowadays (is /proc supposed to go away still? It looks very alive to me and I use it for rrdtool at work.)

If all the lvs stats aren't being shipped to /proc, is it possible to do so?

How much work is involved in making the standard ip_vs active/active?


Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at
Homepage It's GNU/Linux!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>