On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 06:25:20AM -0700, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, pierrick grasland wrote:
>> But how do you work with persistence ? (actually, with -p options).
>> Each call during the interval go to the same server, and then, do you reset
>> the timer for each new call) or no ?
> I'd defer to Horms on this if he thinks otherwise but... I wouldn't do it
> that way. There's all sorts of problems with using a timer in the lvs
> (-p) persistence to detect a returning client and I'm trying to convince
> people to move to the -SH scheduler instead.
> The -SH scheduler addresses the same problem, but by scheduling on the
> CIP. As long as the client doesn't change IPs within their session, then
> you're OK (this is valid except for people using pathologically
> configured proxy setups).
> I don't know if you can us the CIP to uniquely identify a client in SIP.
> If not, you'll have to do it on call-id.
I think that in the case that I was looking at this would not have
worked well as all the traffic came from the same IP address or a
handful of IP addresses - think in terms of handling requests
from a proxy server.
However, -SH might be a good approach for many cases.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html