|
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Sven Wegener <sven.wegener@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Julius Volz wrote:
>> Ok, fixed this up. The mutex is not completely moved down to make the
>> code look a bit nicer (nla_put_failure assumes locked mutex). There
>> should not be much concurrency anyways since this mutex only locks the
>> userspace interface, which is mainly used by ipvsadm.
>
> True, it was just a hint for an optimization. Looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Sven Wegener <sven.wegener@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for the help with this!
> Should we get this into 2.6.27? It's a new interface, currently unused, so
> the chance of breaking anything is marginal.
Yeah, it shouldn't break anything existing and that would be great!
Julius
--
Google Switzerland GmbH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
