Re: [PATCH RFC 19/24] IPVS: Add IPv6 support flag to schedulers

To: Julius Volz <juliusv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 19/24] IPVS: Add IPv6 support flag to schedulers
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, vbusam@xxxxxxxxxx
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:23:11 +1000
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:21:39PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:48 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 06:15:26PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
> >> Add 'supports_ipv6' flag to struct ip_vs_scheduler to indicate whether a
> >> scheduler supports IPv6. Set the flag to 1 in schedulers that work with
> >> IPv6, 0 otherwise. This flag is checked in a later patch while trying to
> >> add a service with a specific scheduler.
> >
> > I wonder if there are some spare bits inside the flags
> > member of ip_vs_scheduler that could be used for this purpose?
> Hm, there isn't any 'flags' member or similar in that struct...
> > Otherwise, I'm fine with this, we can juggle things around
> > later to use the other bits in supports_ipv6 for other things
> > if and when the need arises.
> Yes, then we could also rename it to 'flags' once needed.
> > Here is a version that applies against lvs-2.6
> Thanks, I guess I should start basing all of my IPVS patches on this
> tree rather than net-2.6?

That would make things slightly more convenient for me.
But I'm not the only fish in the sea :-)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>