|
Hello,
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Hannes Eder wrote:
> Update the nf_conntrack tuple in reply direction, as we will see
> traffic from the real server (RIP) to the client (CIP). Once this is
> done we can use netfilters SNAT in POSTROUTING, especially with
> xt_ipvs, to do source NAT, e.g.:
>
> % iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -m ipvs --vaddr 192.168.100.30/32 --vport
> 8080 \
> > -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.10.10
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Eder <heder@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
The following changes in ip_vs_core.c may be break normal
ip_vs_ftp users. Somehow you decided that this POST_ROUTING code is not
needed and deleted it. This code should be present by default.
From http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/LVS.txt:
===
Now after many changes in latest kernels I'm not sure
what happens if netfilter sees IPVS traffic in POST_ROUTING.
Such change require testing of ip_vs_ftp in both passive and
active LVS-NAT mode, with different length of IP address:port
representation in FTP commands, to check if resulting packets
survive double NAT when payload size is changed. It is the best
test for IPVS to see if netfilter additionally changes FTP
packets leading to wrong payload.
===
So, you have to check the ip_vs_ftp case because double
NAT for IPs and Ports usually works but double changing of SEQs
and payload may be not.
You can also check NFCT for IPVS (http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nfct/)
for using netfilter functions and structures (ip_vs_nfct.c)
most recent rediff:
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nfct/ipvs-nfct-2.6.28-1.diff
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> index b227750..27bd002 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> @@ -521,26 +521,6 @@ int ip_vs_leave(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct
> sk_buff *skb,
> return NF_DROP;
> }
>
> -
> -/*
> - * It is hooked before NF_IP_PRI_NAT_SRC at the NF_INET_POST_ROUTING
> - * chain, and is used for VS/NAT.
> - * It detects packets for VS/NAT connections and sends the packets
> - * immediately. This can avoid that iptable_nat mangles the packets
> - * for VS/NAT.
> - */
> -static unsigned int ip_vs_post_routing(unsigned int hooknum,
> - struct sk_buff *skb,
> - const struct net_device *in,
> - const struct net_device *out,
> - int (*okfn)(struct sk_buff *))
> -{
> - if (!skb->ipvs_property)
> - return NF_ACCEPT;
> - /* The packet was sent from IPVS, exit this chain */
> - return NF_STOP;
> -}
> -
> __sum16 ip_vs_checksum_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int offset)
> {
> return csum_fold(skb_checksum(skb, offset, skb->len - offset, 0));
> @@ -1431,14 +1411,6 @@ static struct nf_hook_ops ip_vs_ops[] __read_mostly = {
> .hooknum = NF_INET_FORWARD,
> .priority = 99,
> },
> - /* Before the netfilter connection tracking, exit from POST_ROUTING */
> - {
> - .hook = ip_vs_post_routing,
> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> - .pf = PF_INET,
> - .hooknum = NF_INET_POST_ROUTING,
> - .priority = NF_IP_PRI_NAT_SRC-1,
> - },
> #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
> /* After packet filtering, forward packet through VS/DR, VS/TUN,
> * or VS/NAT(change destination), so that filtering rules can be
> @@ -1467,14 +1439,6 @@ static struct nf_hook_ops ip_vs_ops[] __read_mostly = {
> .hooknum = NF_INET_FORWARD,
> .priority = 99,
> },
> - /* Before the netfilter connection tracking, exit from POST_ROUTING */
> - {
> - .hook = ip_vs_post_routing,
> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> - .pf = PF_INET6,
> - .hooknum = NF_INET_POST_ROUTING,
> - .priority = NF_IP6_PRI_NAT_SRC-1,
> - },
> #endif
> };
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
