LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [PATCH] IPVS: replace sprintf to snprintf to avoid stack buffer over

To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPVS: replace sprintf to snprintf to avoid stack buffer overflow
Cc: wzt.wzt@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:34:46 +1000
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 06:09:54PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:50:20AM +0800, wzt.wzt@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> IPVS not check the length of pp->name, use sprintf will cause stack buffer 
> >> overflow.
> >> struct ip_vs_protocol{} declare name as char *, if register a protocol as:
> >> struct ip_vs_protocol ip_vs_test = {
> >>         .name =                    "aaaaaaaa....128...aaa",
> >>    .debug_packet =         ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet,
> >> };
> >>
> >> when called ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet(), sprintf(buf, "%s TRUNCATED", 
> >> pp->name); 
> >> will cause stack buffer overflow.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhitong Wang <zhitong.wangzt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > I think that the simple answer is, don't do that.
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> > But your patch seems entirely reasonable to me.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Patrick, please consider merging this.
> 
> I think this fix is a bit silly, we can simply print the name in
> the pr_debug() statement and avoid both the potential overflow
> and truncation.
> 
> How does this look?

Looks good to me:

Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>