|
[CCed netdev]
Thanks,
that looks correct to me. Have you tested this change?
If so could you provided a Signed-off-by line
as per section 12 of Documentation/SubmittingPatches?
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 05:19:06PM +0800, xiaoyu Du wrote:
> Hi，all
>
> After I compared the sctp with tcp and udp, I thinkt his a bug that
> sctp_dnat_handler Incorrectly invoked ip_vs_app_pkt_out.
> below is the patch.
>
> ---
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> index c9a3f7a..db55759 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb,
> return 0;
>
> /* Call application helper if needed */
> - if (!ip_vs_app_pkt_out(cp, skb))
> + if (!ip_vs_app_pkt_in(cp, skb))
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
