LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: IPVS: Incorrect helper use for SCTP [was: wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx, horm

To: xiaoyu Du <tingsrain@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPVS: Incorrect helper use for SCTP [was: wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx, horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Cc: lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 21:21:11 +0900
[CCed netdev]

Thanks,

that looks correct to me. Have you tested this change?
If so could you provided a Signed-off-by line
as per section 12 of Documentation/SubmittingPatches?

On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 05:19:06PM +0800, xiaoyu Du wrote:
> Hi,all
> 
> After I compared the sctp with tcp and udp, I thinkt his a bug that
> sctp_dnat_handler Incorrectly invoked ip_vs_app_pkt_out.
> below is the patch.
> 
> ---
>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> index c9a3f7a..db55759 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb,
>                        return 0;
> 
>                /* Call application helper if needed */
> -               if (!ip_vs_app_pkt_out(cp, skb))
> +               if (!ip_vs_app_pkt_in(cp, skb))
>                        return 0;
>        }
> 
> --
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>