lvs-devel
|
To: | Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [patch v2.6 4/4] libxt_ipvs: user-space lib for netfilter matcher xt_ipvs |
Cc: | lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julius Volz <julius.volz@xxxxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hannes Eder <heder@xxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:21:59 +0900 |
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:35:19AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Wednesday 2010-07-21 03:21, Simon Horman wrote: > >> + > >> +#define XT_IPVS_IPVS_PROPERTY (1 << 0) /* all other options imply > >> this one */ > >> +#define XT_IPVS_PROTO (1 << 1) > >> +#define XT_IPVS_VADDR (1 << 2) > >> +#define XT_IPVS_VPORT (1 << 3) > >> +#define XT_IPVS_DIR (1 << 4) > >> +#define XT_IPVS_METHOD (1 << 5) > >> +#define XT_IPVS_VPORTCTL (1 << 6) > >> +#define XT_IPVS_MASK ((1 << 7) - 1) > >> +#define XT_IPVS_ONCE_MASK (XT_IPVS_MASK & ~XT_IPVS_IPVS_PROPERTY) > > Can't these just be an enum? More than one option can be used at once - they form a mini bitmap - so no, I don't think we can use an enum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html |
Previous by Date: | Re: [patch v2.6 4/4] libxt_ipvs: user-space lib for netfilter matcher xt_ipvs, Jan Engelhardt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [patch v2.6 4/4] libxt_ipvs: user-space lib for netfilter matcher xt_ipvs, Jan Engelhardt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch v2.6 4/4] libxt_ipvs: user-space lib for netfilter matcher xt_ipvs, Jan Engelhardt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [patch v2.6 4/4] libxt_ipvs: user-space lib for netfilter matcher xt_ipvs, Jan Engelhardt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |