Re: RE: Re: Fwd: LVS on local node

To: Franchoze Eric <franchoze@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RE: Re: Fwd: LVS on local node
Cc: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>, wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:24:10 +0800
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 5:37 AM, Franchoze Eric <franchoze@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 23.07.10, 01:01, "Graeme Fowler" <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> Hi
>>  Technically keepalived is not LVS. It's a monitoring/mgmt app which can 
>> manage an LVS according to health-check logic. LVS by itself cannot "detect" 
>> any form of service failure - it's a fancy router with special rules.
>>  Graeme.
> Ah, ok. Then with iptables I can write keepalived app to insert/remove rules.
> Is there interface to iptables for dynamically turn on/off rules without 
> inserting and removing them from the table?

xt_condition is on its way to mainline.

Changli Gao(xiaosuo@xxxxxxxxx)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>