|
Hi simon,
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
|
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:51:25PM +0900, Sohgo Takeuchi wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Sohgo Takeuchi <sohgo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> |
>> > I found a bug in ldirectord and attach a patch to fix this
>> > problem to this E-mail.
>> >
>> > The bug is that if a port is omitted in a "fallback" in a
>> > virtual section, the entry is never seen in the virtual server
>> > table even if all real servers are down.
>> >
>> > virtual=10.10.100.1:daytime
>> > real=10.10.100.2:daytime gate
>> > fallback=127.0.0.1
>> >
>> > A debug message says like this.
>> >
>> > DEBUG2: Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r
>> > 127.0.0.1: -g -w 1)
>> > Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r 127.0.0.1: -g -w
>> > 1)
>> > illegal real server address[:port] specified
>> > DEBUG2: system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r 127.0.0.1: -g -w
>> > 1) failed:
>> > system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r 127.0.0.1: -g -w 1)
>> > failed:
>> >
>> >
>> > The problem in the source code is that when a port of "fallback"
>> > is omitted, the port is derived from a port specified in a
>> > "virtual" service (from a behavior of the parse_fallback
>> > function), but the port is used before it is defined.
>> >
>> > I tested ldirectord on Ubuntu 10.04 with perl 5.10.1.
>> >
>> > with best regards,
>>
>> Does anyone have an interest in this bug?
>
> Sorry, I missed your previous post.
> I have pushed your patch into the agents tree.
Thank you very much!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
