LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [PATCH] ipvs: use pkts for SCTP too

To: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipvs: use pkts for SCTP too
Cc: lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:58:24 +0300 (EEST)
        Hello,

On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Simon Horman wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 02:47:26AM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > 
> >     Use correctly the in_pkts packet counter also for SCTP
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> >     This patch is for net-next
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> apart from the minor nit below, this looks good to me.
> Should I submit it to net-next ?

        Yes, please submit the fixed version. Sometimes
I forget that my style for 'else' does not match the kernel's
one.

> > --- v2.6.36-rc2/linux/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c       2010-09-01 
> > 23:47:47.000000000 +0300
> > +++ linux/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c   2010-09-01 23:55:30.000000000 
> > +0300
> > @@ -1380,8 +1380,7 @@ ip_vs_in(unsigned int hooknum, struct sk
> >     if (af == AF_INET && (ip_vs_sync_state & IP_VS_STATE_MASTER) &&
> >         cp->protocol == IPPROTO_SCTP) {
> >             if ((cp->state == IP_VS_SCTP_S_ESTABLISHED &&
> > -                   (atomic_read(&cp->in_pkts) %
> > -                    sysctl_ip_vs_sync_threshold[1]
> > +                   (pkts % sysctl_ip_vs_sync_threshold[1]
> >                      == sysctl_ip_vs_sync_threshold[0])) ||
> >                             (cp->old_state != cp->state &&
> >                              ((cp->state == IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED) ||
> > @@ -1391,7 +1390,8 @@ ip_vs_in(unsigned int hooknum, struct sk
> >                     goto out;
> >             }
> >     }
> > -
> > +   else
> > +   /* Keep this block last: TCP and others with pp->num_states <= 1 */
> >     if (af == AF_INET &&
> >         (ip_vs_sync_state & IP_VS_STATE_MASTER) &&
> >         (((cp->protocol != IPPROTO_TCP ||
> 
> The else and the if really ought to be on the same line:

        Yes, thanks!

> 
> @@ -1395,7 +1394,8 @@ ip_vs_in(unsigned int hooknum, struct sk
>               }
>       }
>  
> -     if (af == AF_INET &&
> +     /* Keep this block last: TCP and others with pp->num_states <= 1 */
> +     else if (af == AF_INET &&
>           (ip_vs_sync_state & IP_VS_STATE_MASTER) &&
>           (((cp->protocol != IPPROTO_TCP ||
>              cp->state == IP_VS_TCP_S_ESTABLISHED) &&
> 

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>