On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:40:33AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 13:02:29 +0900
> > From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> > - Do not create expectation when forwarding the PORT
> > command to avoid blocking the connection. The problem is that
> > nf_conntrack_ftp.c:help() tries to create the same expectation later in
> > POST_ROUTING and drops the packet with "dropping packet" message after
> > failure in nf_ct_expect_related.
> > - Change ip_vs_update_conntrack to alter the conntrack
> > for related connections from real server. If we do not alter the reply in
> > this direction the next packet from client sent to vport 20 comes as NEW
> > connection. We alter it but may be some collision happens for both
> > conntracks and the second conntrack gets destroyed immediately. The
> > connection stucks too.
> > Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Applied, thanks.
> > This change is also applicable to net-next, although there is some diff
> > noise. Do you want me to resolve that and post a net-next version
> > separately? (The same applies to "ipvs: avoid oops for passive FTP" which
> > you merged into net last week.)
> No need, the next time I merge net-2.6 into net-next-2.6 it will be
> taken care of transparently.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html