LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

[PATCH 3/3] ipvs: make rerouting optional with snat_reroute

To: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ipvs: make rerouting optional with snat_reroute
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:49:52 +0300 (EEST)
        Add new sysctl flag "snat_reroute". Recent kernels use
ip_route_me_harder() to route LVS-NAT responses properly by
VIP when there are multiple paths to client. But setups
that do not have alternative default routes can skip this
routing lookup by using snat_reroute=0.

Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
---

diff -urp net-next-2.6-e548833-nfct/linux/include/net/ip_vs.h 
linux/include/net/ip_vs.h
--- net-next-2.6-e548833-nfct/linux/include/net/ip_vs.h 2010-09-16 
09:02:25.000000000 +0300
+++ linux/include/net/ip_vs.h   2010-09-16 09:03:48.000000000 +0300
@@ -801,6 +801,7 @@ extern int sysctl_ip_vs_expire_quiescent
 extern int sysctl_ip_vs_sync_threshold[2];
 extern int sysctl_ip_vs_nat_icmp_send;
 extern int sysctl_ip_vs_conntrack;
+extern int sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute;
 extern struct ip_vs_stats ip_vs_stats;
 extern const struct ctl_path net_vs_ctl_path[];
 
diff -urp net-next-2.6-e548833-nfct/linux/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c 
linux/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
--- net-next-2.6-e548833-nfct/linux/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c     
2010-09-16 09:02:25.000000000 +0300
+++ linux/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c       2010-09-16 09:07:13.000000000 
+0300
@@ -929,20 +929,31 @@ handle_response(int af, struct sk_buff *
                ip_send_check(ip_hdr(skb));
        }
 
+       /*
+        * nf_iterate does not expect change in the skb->dst->dev.
+        * It looks like it is not fatal to enable this code for hooks
+        * where our handlers are at the end of the chain list and
+        * when all next handlers use skb->dst->dev and not outdev.
+        * It will definitely route properly the inout NAT traffic
+        * when multiple paths are used.
+        */
+
        /* For policy routing, packets originating from this
         * machine itself may be routed differently to packets
         * passing through.  We want this packet to be routed as
         * if it came from this machine itself.  So re-compute
         * the routing information.
         */
+       if (sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
-       if (af == AF_INET6) {
-               if (ip6_route_me_harder(skb) != 0)
-                       goto drop;
-       } else
+               if (af == AF_INET6) {
+                       if (ip6_route_me_harder(skb) != 0)
+                               goto drop;
+               } else
 #endif
-               if (ip_route_me_harder(skb, RTN_LOCAL) != 0)
-                       goto drop;
+                       if (ip_route_me_harder(skb, RTN_LOCAL) != 0)
+                               goto drop;
+       }
 
        IP_VS_DBG_PKT(10, pp, skb, 0, "After SNAT");
 
@@ -991,8 +1002,13 @@ ip_vs_out(unsigned int hooknum, struct s
                if (unlikely(iph.protocol == IPPROTO_ICMPV6)) {
                        int related, verdict = ip_vs_out_icmp_v6(skb, &related);
 
-                       if (related)
+                       if (related) {
+                               if (sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute &&
+                                       NF_ACCEPT == verdict &&
+                                       ip6_route_me_harder(skb))
+                                       verdict = NF_DROP;
                                return verdict;
+                       }
                        ip_vs_fill_iphdr(af, skb_network_header(skb), &iph);
                }
        } else
@@ -1000,8 +1016,13 @@ ip_vs_out(unsigned int hooknum, struct s
                if (unlikely(iph.protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP)) {
                        int related, verdict = ip_vs_out_icmp(skb, &related);
 
-                       if (related)
+                       if (related) {
+                               if (sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute &&
+                                       NF_ACCEPT == verdict &&
+                                       ip_route_me_harder(skb, RTN_LOCAL))
+                                       verdict = NF_DROP;
                                return verdict;
+                       }
                        ip_vs_fill_iphdr(af, skb_network_header(skb), &iph);
                }
 
diff -urp net-next-2.6-e548833-nfct/linux/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c 
linux/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
--- net-next-2.6-e548833-nfct/linux/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c      
2010-09-16 09:02:25.000000000 +0300
+++ linux/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c        2010-09-16 09:08:47.000000000 
+0300
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ int sysctl_ip_vs_nat_icmp_send = 0;
 #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_NFCT
 int sysctl_ip_vs_conntrack;
 #endif
+int sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute = 1;
 
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_DEBUG
@@ -1599,6 +1600,13 @@ static struct ctl_table vs_vars[] = {
                .mode           = 0644,
                .proc_handler   = proc_do_defense_mode,
        },
+       {
+               .procname       = "snat_reroute",
+               .data           = &sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute,
+               .maxlen         = sizeof(int),
+               .mode           = 0644,
+               .proc_handler   = &proc_dointvec,
+       },
 #if 0
        {
                .procname       = "timeout_established",
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>