![]() |
lvs-devel
|
| To: | paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] ipvs network name space aware |
| Cc: | Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx>, "lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ja@xxxxxx" <ja@xxxxxx>, "wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| From: | Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:24:56 +0200 |
Le jeudi 21 octobre 2010 à 08:16 -0700, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
> Here is what it looks like in my -rcu tree:
>
> void __rcu_read_lock(void)
> {
> current->rcu_read_lock_nesting++;
> barrier(); /* needed if we ever invoke rcu_read_lock in rcutree.c */
> }
>
> So yes, I finally did convince myself that the ACCESS_ONCE was not
> needed. ;-)
>
> This is not yet in mainline, but Ingo sent the series containing this
> commit (80dcf60e) to Linus earlier today, so there is hope!
>
Excellent, thanks for taking time to clarify this Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] ipvs network name space aware, Paul E. McKenney |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 00/12] ipvs: changes for local server and local client, Julian Anastasov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] ipvs network name space aware, Paul E. McKenney |
| Next by Thread: | [RFC PATCH 2/9] ipvs network name space aware, Hans Schillstrom |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |