Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] ipvs network name space aware

To: paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] ipvs network name space aware
Cc: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx>, "lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ja@xxxxxx" <ja@xxxxxx>, "wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:24:56 +0200
Le jeudi 21 octobre 2010 à 08:16 -0700, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :

> Here is what it looks like in my -rcu tree:
> void __rcu_read_lock(void)
> {
>       current->rcu_read_lock_nesting++;
>       barrier();  /* needed if we ever invoke rcu_read_lock in rcutree.c */
> }
> So yes, I finally did convince myself that the ACCESS_ONCE was not
> needed.  ;-)
> This is not yet in mainline, but Ingo sent the series containing this
> commit (80dcf60e) to Linus earlier today, so there is hope!

Excellent, thanks for taking time to clarify this Paul.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>