On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 03:07:38PM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> On Friday 22 October 2010 21:05:48 Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 01:17:02PM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> > > This patch just contains ip_vs_ctl
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by:Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> > > b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> > > index ca8ec8c..7e99cbc 100644
> > > --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> > > +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> > [ snip ]
> > Hi Hans,
> > is there a reason that the order some of the entries in
> > vs_vars has been switched around?
> Yes there is, when vars will be copied to it's own NS it's a lot easier
> when they are in sequence and without a potential insert in the middle
> the #if 0 ...
> have a look at __ip_vs_control_init(struct net *net)
Ok, I suspected something like that.
In that case I think there may be a problem with
the way that I handled sysctl_ip_vs_conntrack.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html