IPVS: sync_options needed (removal of some code...)?

lvs-devel

IPVS: sync_options needed (removal of some code...)?

To:	Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, "wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	IPVS: sync_options needed (removal of some code...)?
From:	Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:18:56 +0200

Hello
do we really need sync_options any more ?
(tcp seq re-calc)

I might be blid, but I can't see anyone use it.
ip_vs_ftp_in() and ip_vs_ftp_out() do set diff=0 and never change them.

Less code makes Linus happy :-)
--
Regards
Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
IPVS: sync_options needed (removal of some code...)?, Hans Schillstrom <= Re: IPVS: sync_options needed (removal of some code...)?, Julian Anastasov Re: IPVS: sync_options needed (removal of some code...)?, Hans Schillstrom

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] IPVS: ip_vs_pe.c, use strncmp to be safe., Simon Horman
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] IPVS: ip_vs_pe.c, use strncmp to be safe., Patrick McHardy
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] IPVS: ip_vs_pe.c, use strncmp to be safe., Hans Schillstrom
Next by Thread:	Re: IPVS: sync_options needed (removal of some code...)?, Julian Anastasov
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]