LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [PATCH 00/22] ipvs namespaces v3.3

To: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] ipvs namespaces v3.3
Cc: netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:11:12 +0100
On 13/01/11 02:52, Simon Horman wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
> 
> this changest includes the following changes since the v3.2 series
> which was most recently posted as "[GIT PULL nf-next-2.6] ipvs namespaces".
> 
> * Remove several hunks that only make whitespace changes

Thanks a lot for doing this.

> * Add Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
>   (It was an omission from v3.2)
> * Fix merge conflicts
> 
> There are two changes that produce conflicts
> * In the current net-next-2.6 tree but absent from the current nf-next-2.6 
> tree
>   there is "workqueue: convert
>   cancel_rearming_delayed_work[queue]() users to cancel_delayed_work_sync()"
> * And in the current nf-next-2.6 tree  but absent from the current
>   net-next-2.6 tree there is "net: use the macros defined for the members
>   of flowi"

nf-*-2.6 are Patrick's trees. My trees are here:

http://1984.lsi.us.es/git/

> In order to create this series I merged net-next-2.6 into nf-next-2.6.
> The result is at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/lvs-test-2.6 ipvs-netns3.3
> 
> However, I guess that you have already done your own merge and simply
> pulling the branch above will create a bit of a mess. Please let me know
> if you have a tree/branch that I should use as a base for a pull request.

I have pulled it, everything was fine. Thanks Simon!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>