![]() |
lvs-devel
|
| To: | Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered |
| Cc: | wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx, horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ja@xxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, davej@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| From: | Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Apr 2012 02:54:13 +0200 |
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> If you return here, I think you'll leave things in inconsistent state, >> ie. the tcp protocol is registered. You have to unregister it before >> leaving. I thought that the cleanup callback is getting called for failed init calls, if that's not the case then we can probably call it ourselves if any of these failed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered, Simon Horman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered, Simon Horman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered, Simon Horman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered, Simon Horman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |