Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where possibl

To: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where possible
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:23:27 -0700
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:17:08PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
> Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC when registering an ipvs protocol.
> This is safe since it will always run from a process context.
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

How does this patch meet the Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>