Re: [v2 PATCH 1/1] ipvs: kernel oops - do_ip_vs_get_ctl

To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 1/1] ipvs: kernel oops - do_ip_vs_get_ctl
Cc: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, ja@xxxxxx, wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx, rohara@xxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:05:20 +0900
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:10:41AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 07:47 +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> > Change order of init so netns init is ready
> > when register ioctl and netlink.
> > 
> > Ver2 
> >     Whitespace fixes and __init added.
> > 
> > Reported-by: "Ryan O'Hara" <rohara@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Looks good, interdiff says you fixed up things, and I have tested it
> against the net tree, good work :-)
> Is this a stable tree candidate?

Yes, I think so.

I now have the following 7 changes in my ipvs tree on

The last two are already in Pablo's net tree and I intend
to send a pull request for the remaining 5 soon.

It is my opinion that all 7 patches are stable tree material.

ipvs: kernel oops - do_ip_vs_get_ctl
ipvs: take care of return value from protocol init_netns
ipvs: null check of net->ipvs in lblc(r) shedulers
ipvs: reset ipvs pointer in netns
ipvs: add check in ftp for initialized core
ipvs: fix crash in ip_vs_control_net_cleanup on unload
ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>