Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where poss

lvs-devel

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where poss

To:	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where possible
Cc:	wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ja@xxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, davej@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From:	Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 2 May 2012 10:19:50 +0900

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 12:37:47PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC when registering an ipvs protocol.
> 
> This is safe since it will always run from a process context.

For the benefit of patchwork, this patch is in ipvs-next.

Thanks again for the good work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where possible, Simon Horman <=

Previous by Date:	[ANNOUNCE] ipvs and ipvs-next trees rebased, Simon Horman
Next by Date:	Re: [GIT PULL next-net] IPVS, Simon Horman
Previous by Thread:	[ANNOUNCE] ipvs and ipvs-next trees rebased, Simon Horman
Next by Thread:	[GIT PULL net-next v2] IPVS, Simon Horman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]