LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re[2]: [PATCH 2/3] ipvs: Fix faulty IPv6 extension header handling in

To: "Patrick McHardy" <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re[2]: [PATCH 2/3] ipvs: Fix faulty IPv6 extension header handling in IPVS
Cc: "Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Julian Anastasov" <ja@xxxxxx>, "Simon Horman" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Wensong Zhang" <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Hans Schillstrom" <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:55:14 +0200 (CEST)
>
>On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
>> Based on patch from: Hans Schillstrom
>>
>> IPv6 headers must be processed in order of appearance,
>> neither can it be assumed that Upper layer headers is first.
>> If anything else than L4 is the first header IPVS will throw it.
>>
>> IPVS will write SNAT & DNAT modifications at a fixed pos which
>> will corrupt the message. Proper header position must be found
>> before writing modifying packet.
>>
>> This patch contains a lot of API changes.  This is done, to avoid
>> the costly scan of finding the IPv6 headers, via ipv6_find_hdr().
>> Finding the IPv6 headers is done as early as possible, and passed
>> on as a pointer "struct ip_vs_iphdr *" to the affected functions.
>
>How about we change netfilter to set up the skb's transport header
>at an early time so we can avoid all (most of) these header scans
>in netfilter?

I think that would be great, maybe it should be global i.e. not only a 
netfilter issue.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>