|
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:50:29AM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:54:23AM +0100, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> > > Hello Julian
> > > Great work!
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 11:57 +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > > > This is a first patchset for IPVS optimizations.
> > > > Another patchset will address the locking in schedulers
> > > > and moving the global _bh disabling from LOCAL_OUT to all
> > > > locks.
> > > >
> > > > All patches are for net-next and Simon can
> > > > take them for ipvs-next.
> > > >
> > > > The changes in this patchset eliminate locks
> > > > and dst refcnt operations from packet processing by
> > > > using RCU. There are more details in the patches.
> > >
> > > I've gone through all patches and tested them now
> > > it looks very promising, all my tests have passed.
> > >
> > > Signed-off by: Hans Schillstrom <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Thanks, and sorry to be a bit slow.
> >
> > I will push these to the ipvs-next tree.
> > I will then post them to netdev and David Miller for
> > review as I think the first patch falls into that realm.
>
> He already acked v2 of this patch and I added his
> last comment in v3:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136294921002680&w=2
>
> I preferred not to disturb netdev with v3, it
> has small changes after v2.
Thanks, and sorry for missing that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
