Re: [PATCH] Sloppy TCP, SH rebalancing, SHP scheduling

[Alexander Frolkin <avf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

> > Is there a reason why the SH fallback behaviour shouldn't be default?
> > That is, is there a reason why the current behaviour (client connection
> > gets reset if it is directed to a realserver with weight 0) is
> > desirable?
> I don't know, the authors preferred this behaviour.

Is it worth looking at changing this?  Or is this going to be too
difficult a change to push through?

I just don't understand why rejecting a client connection when there are
servers available is desirable behaviour.


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html