|
Hey Julian,
On 9/9/14 12:41 PM, Julian Anastasov wrote:
Hello Alex,
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Alex Gartrell wrote:
So, if I understand correctly, we'll wait until it lands in net-next and then
I'll submit these patches to netdev?
I think, you can now submit the patchset, net was
merged to net-next, so you need a fresh net-next copy.
I've picked these patches onto net-next and am going to test it now.
Will submit the patchset shortly.
Also, can you try my ipvsadm patches to check for
possible problems in the connection listing, so that we
can safely apply them to the ipvsadm tree.
All of the ipvsadm changes work as expected, but it needs an additional
tweak:
diff --git a/ipvsadm.c b/ipvsadm.c
index d12070e..ef19091 100644
--- a/ipvsadm.c
+++ b/ipvsadm.c
@@ -1629,7 +1629,7 @@ print_service_entry(ipvs_service_entry_t *se,
unsigned int format)
fprintf(stderr, "addrport_to_anyname fails\n");
exit(1);
}
- if (!(format & FMT_RULE) && (se->af != AF_INET6))
+ if (!(format & FMT_RULE) && (e->af != AF_INET6))
dname[28] = '\0';
if (format & FMT_RULE) {
Thanks,
--
Alex Gartrell <agartrell@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
