|
Hello,
Adding Simon to CC...
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
> i tried with 3.12.33 without any XFRM and now got this one (which is
> reproducable):
>
> [ 233.956012] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> 00000000
> 00000014
> [ 233.956218] IP: [<ffffffffa013a470>] nf_ct_seqadj_set+0x60/0x90
> [nf_conntrack
It seems fix from 3.13 was not sent to 3.12 stable:
commit b25adce1606427fd8 ("ipvs: correct usage/allocation of seqadj ext in
ipvs")
There was related change but it is not needed
for stable kernels:
commit db12cf27435356017e ("netfilter: WARN about wrong usage of sequence
number adjustments"
Simon, can we try commit b25adce1606427fd8 for 3.12?
> setup is like this:
>
>
> #virtual=<myVIP>:21
> # real=10.10.1.20:21 masq
> # real=10.10.1.21:21 masq
> # real=10.10.1.22:21 masq
> # real=10.10.1.23:21 masq
> # persistent=600
> # service=ftp
> # scheduler=rr
> # protocol=tcp
> # checktype=connect
>
> ( i remarked it to prevent fruther crashes...)
>
> when ip_vs_ftp is loaded and someone trying to make a ftp connection, the
> system
> panics instantly.
>
> 10.10.1.20 - 10.10.1.23 are lxc-containers using veth connected to the bridge
> running on 4 different nodes. The node running ldirector/ipvsadm has also one
> of
> those containers running (don't know if that matters)
It is always good to know the setup. Do you access VIP
from local clients (from director)?
> brctl show
> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
> br0 8000.00259052bbf4 no bond0
> vethMKELUc
> vethXdWGqf
> vethgJMmEb
> vethmKNqFc
>
>
> I disabled the ftp server lxc container on the node doing ip_vs, so that the
> endpoint of the connection is not on the same node and tried again but with
> the
> same result.
>
> Unfortunatelly i cannot test with newer kernels than 3.12, because ocfs2 is
> somehow broken in >= 3.14
Before I create patch to avoid rerouting for
LOCAL_IN you can try to set IPVS sysctl var "snat_reroute" to 0
or even to change ip_vs_route_me_harder() function just to return 0.
snat_reroute=1 (a default value) is needed if you have
multiple links to clients and use ip rules to select
correct route by src ip (after SNAT). If you have single
uplink snat_reroute can be 0.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
