lvs-devel
|
To: | Vincent Bernat <vincent@xxxxxxxxx>, Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [PATCH net-next v1] ipvs: add consistent source hashing scheduling |
From: | Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 2 Apr 2018 10:33:27 -0700 |
On 04/02/2018 10:20 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote: > +static inline u32 > +ip_vs_csh_permutation(struct ip_vs_dest *d, int j) > +{ > + u32 offset, skip; > + __be32 addr_fold = d->addr.ip; > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6 > + if (d->af == AF_INET6) > + addr_fold = d->addr.ip6[0]^d->addr.ip6[1]^ > + d->addr.ip6[2]^d->addr.ip6[3]; > +#endif > + addr_fold = ntohl(addr_fold) + ntohs(d->port); > + offset = hash_32(addr_fold, 32) % IP_VS_CSH_TAB_SIZE; > + skip = (hash_32(addr_fold + 1, 32) % (IP_VS_CSH_TAB_SIZE - 1)) + 1; > + return (offset + j * skip) % IP_VS_CSH_TAB_SIZE; > +} > + This does not look very strong to me, particularly the IPv6 folding I would rather use __ipv6_addr_jhash() instead of ipv6_addr_hash(), even if it is hard coded ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [PATCH net-next v1] ipvs: add consistent source hashing scheduling, Vincent Bernat |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH net-next v1] ipvs: add consistent source hashing scheduling, Vincent Bernat |
Previous by Thread: | [PATCH net-next v1] ipvs: add consistent source hashing scheduling, Vincent Bernat |
Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH net-next v1] ipvs: add consistent source hashing scheduling, Vincent Bernat |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |