![]() |
lvs-devel
|
| To: | Vincent Bernat <vincent@xxxxxxxxx>, Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH net-next v1] ipvs: add consistent source hashing scheduling |
| From: | Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Apr 2018 10:33:27 -0700 |
On 04/02/2018 10:20 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> +static inline u32
> +ip_vs_csh_permutation(struct ip_vs_dest *d, int j)
> +{
> + u32 offset, skip;
> + __be32 addr_fold = d->addr.ip;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
> + if (d->af == AF_INET6)
> + addr_fold = d->addr.ip6[0]^d->addr.ip6[1]^
> + d->addr.ip6[2]^d->addr.ip6[3];
> +#endif
> + addr_fold = ntohl(addr_fold) + ntohs(d->port);
> + offset = hash_32(addr_fold, 32) % IP_VS_CSH_TAB_SIZE;
> + skip = (hash_32(addr_fold + 1, 32) % (IP_VS_CSH_TAB_SIZE - 1)) + 1;
> + return (offset + j * skip) % IP_VS_CSH_TAB_SIZE;
> +}
> +
This does not look very strong to me, particularly the IPv6 folding
I would rather use __ipv6_addr_jhash() instead of ipv6_addr_hash(), even if it
is hard coded ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH net-next v1] ipvs: add consistent source hashing scheduling, Vincent Bernat |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH net-next v1] ipvs: add consistent source hashing scheduling, Vincent Bernat |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH net-next v1] ipvs: add consistent source hashing scheduling, Vincent Bernat |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH net-next v1] ipvs: add consistent source hashing scheduling, Vincent Bernat |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |