lvs-devel
|
To: | Andrew Sy Kim <kim.andrewsy@xxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [PATCH net-next] ipvs: ensure RCU read unlock when connection flushing and ipvs is disabled |
Cc: | Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 16 Jul 2020 20:26:53 +0300 (EEST) |
Hello, On Thu, 16 Jul 2020, Andrew Sy Kim wrote: > When ipvs is disabled in ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush, > we should break instead of return so that rcu_read_unlock() > is run. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Sy Kim <kim.andrewsy@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> > --- > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c > index a5e9b2d55e57..a90b8eac16ac 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c > @@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ void ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush(struct netns_ipvs > *ipvs) > > /* netns clean up started, abort delayed work */ > if (!ipvs->enable) > - return; > + break; > } > rcu_read_unlock(); > } > -- > 2.20.1 Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [PATCH net-next] ipvs: ensure RCU read unlock when connection flushing and ipvs is disabled, Andrew Sy Kim |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [PATCH net-next] ipvs: missing unlock in ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush(), Dan Carpenter |
Previous by Thread: | [PATCH net-next] ipvs: ensure RCU read unlock when connection flushing and ipvs is disabled, Andrew Sy Kim |
Next by Thread: | [PATCH net-next] ipvs: missing unlock in ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush(), Dan Carpenter |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |