Hello,
On Wed, 18 Aug 2021, Dust Li wrote:
> fix #31562403
>
> estimation_timer will iterater the est_list to do estimation
> for each ipvs stats. When there are lots of services, the
> list can be very large.
> We observiced estimation_timer() run for more then 200ms on
> a machine with 104 CPU and 50K services.
>
> yunhong-cgl jiang report the same phenomenon before:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/lvs-devel/msg05426.html
>
> In some cases(for example a large K8S cluster with many ipvs services),
> ipvs estimation may not be needed. So adding a sysctl blob to allow
> users to disable this completely.
>
> Default is: 1 (enable)
I guess, this patch should target net-next tree.
> Signed-off-by: Dust Li <dust.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/networking/ipvs-sysctl.rst | 17 ++++++
> include/net/ip_vs.h | 3 +
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ipvs-sysctl.rst
> b/Documentation/networking/ipvs-sysctl.rst
> index 2afccc63856e..e20f7a27fc85 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/ipvs-sysctl.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/ipvs-sysctl.rst
> @@ -300,3 +300,20 @@ sync_version - INTEGER
>
> Kernels with this sync_version entry are able to receive messages
> of both version 1 and version 2 of the synchronisation protocol.
> +
> +run_estimation - BOOLEAN
> + 0 - disabled
> + not 0 - enabled (default)
> +
> + If disabled, the estimation will be stop, and you can't see
> + any update on speed estimation data.
> +
> + For example
> + 'Conns/s Pkts/s Pkts/s Bytes/s Bytes/s'
> + those data in /proc/net/ip_vs_stats will always be zero.
> + Note, this only affect the speed estimation, the total data
> + will still be updated.
> +
> + You can always re-enable estimation by setting this value to 1.
> + But be carefull, the first estimation after re-enable is not
> + accurate.
> diff --git a/include/net/ip_vs.h b/include/net/ip_vs.h
> index d609e957a3ec..6cbb3a08b176 100644
> --- a/include/net/ip_vs.h
> +++ b/include/net/ip_vs.h
> @@ -941,6 +941,9 @@ struct netns_ipvs {
> struct ctl_table_header *lblcr_ctl_header;
> struct ctl_table *lblcr_ctl_table;
> /* ip_vs_est */
> + int sysctl_run_estimation;
We should keep such sysctl vars in a CONFIG_SYSCTL block
and we have corresponding inline functions for the two
cases depending on CONFIG_SYSCTL. Still, many of the sysctl_*
fields are not moved into such ifdef.
But you can get sysctl_pmtu_disc as example:
# grep -r sysctl_pmtu_disc include/net/ip_vs.h net/netfilter/ipvs/
Add the var in ip_vs_ctl.c as the other vars
and implement it just like sysctl_pmtu_disc.
> + struct ctl_table_header *est_ctl_header;
> + struct ctl_table *est_ctl_table;
As result, we will not need specific ctl table
> struct list_head est_list; /* estimator list */
> spinlock_t est_lock;
> struct timer_list est_timer; /* Estimation timer */
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c
> index 05b8112ffb37..6709796b8621 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c
> @@ -100,6 +100,9 @@ static void estimation_timer(struct timer_list *t)
> u64 rate;
> struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = from_timer(ipvs, t, est_timer);
>
> + if (!ipvs->sysctl_run_estimation)
> + goto skip;
Some day this var will not be present if !CONFIG_SYSCTL,
so we should call the new inline function:
if (!sysctl_run_estimation(ipvs))
goto skip;
> +
> spin_lock(&ipvs->est_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(e, &ipvs->est_list, list) {
> s = container_of(e, struct ip_vs_stats, est);
> @@ -131,6 +134,8 @@ static void estimation_timer(struct timer_list *t)
> spin_unlock(&s->lock);
> }
> spin_unlock(&ipvs->est_lock);
> +
> +skip:
> mod_timer(&ipvs->est_timer, jiffies + 2*HZ);
> }
>
> @@ -184,10 +189,77 @@ void ip_vs_read_estimator(struct ip_vs_kstats *dst,
> struct ip_vs_stats *stats)
> dst->outbps = (e->outbps + 0xF) >> 5;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> +/* IPVS ESTIMATION sysctl table */
> +static struct ctl_table vs_vars_table[] = {
> + {
> + .procname = "run_estimation",
> + .data = NULL,
> + .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> + .mode = 0644,
> + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
> + },
> + { }
> +};
> +
> +static int ip_vs_est_sysctl_init(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
> +{
> + struct net *net = ipvs->net;
> +
> + if (!net_eq(net, &init_net)) {
> + ipvs->est_ctl_table = kmemdup(vs_vars_table,
> + sizeof(vs_vars_table),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ipvs->est_ctl_table)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* Don't export sysctls to unprivileged users */
> + if (net->user_ns != &init_user_ns)
> + ipvs->est_ctl_table[0].procname = NULL;
> +
> + } else {
> + ipvs->est_ctl_table = vs_vars_table;
> + }
> +
> + ipvs->sysctl_run_estimation = 1;
> + ipvs->est_ctl_table[0].data = &ipvs->sysctl_run_estimation;
> +
> + ipvs->est_ctl_header =
> + register_net_sysctl(net, "net/ipv4/vs", ipvs->est_ctl_table);
> + if (!ipvs->est_ctl_header) {
> + if (!net_eq(net, &init_net))
> + kfree(ipvs->est_ctl_table);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ip_vs_est_sysctl_cleanup(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
> +{
> + unregister_net_sysctl_table(ipvs->est_ctl_header);
> +
> + if (!net_eq(ipvs->net, &init_net))
> + kfree(ipvs->est_ctl_table);
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static int ip_vs_est_sysctl_init(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
> +{
> + ipvs->sysctl_run_estimation = 1;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ip_vs_est_sysctl_cleanup(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs) { }
> +
> +#endif
Drop this ctl table. Just reset sysctl_run_estimation in
ip_vs_control_net_init_sysctl().
> +
> int __net_init ip_vs_estimator_net_init(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
> {
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ipvs->est_list);
> spin_lock_init(&ipvs->est_lock);
> + ip_vs_est_sysctl_init(ipvs);
> timer_setup(&ipvs->est_timer, estimation_timer, 0);
> mod_timer(&ipvs->est_timer, jiffies + 2 * HZ);
> return 0;
> @@ -196,4 +268,5 @@ int __net_init ip_vs_estimator_net_init(struct netns_ipvs
> *ipvs)
> void __net_exit ip_vs_estimator_net_cleanup(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
> {
> del_timer_sync(&ipvs->est_timer);
> + ip_vs_est_sysctl_cleanup(ipvs);
> }
> --
> 2.19.1.3.ge56e4f7
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|