lvs-devel
|
To: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] ipvs: Fix checksumming on GSO of SCTP packets |
Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Firo Yang <firo.yang@xxxxxxxx>, Andreas Taschner <andreas.taschner@xxxxxxxx>, Michal Kubeček <mkubecek@xxxxxxxx>, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, coreteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Ismael Luceno <iluceno@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 21 Apr 2024 16:26:59 +0200 |
On 21/Apr/2024 14:01, Julian Anastasov wrote: <...> > Thanks for the fix, I'll accept this but skb_is_gso_sctp() > has comment for pre-condition: skb_is_gso(skb). Can you send v2 > with it? Thanks; sent! > I'm guessing what should be the Fixes line, may be?: > > Fixes: 90017accff61 ("sctp: Add GSO support") This seems like the right one. > because SCTP GSO was added after the IPVS code? Or the > more recent commit d02f51cbcf12 which adds skb_is_gso_sctp ? That doesn't seem related at all. Do we need to check .gso_type in cases like this? |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [PATCH v2] ipvs: Fix checksumming on GSO of SCTP packets, Ismael Luceno |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] ipvs: Fix checksumming on GSO of SCTP packets, Julian Anastasov |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] ipvs: Fix checksumming on GSO of SCTP packets, Julian Anastasov |
Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] ipvs: Fix checksumming on GSO of SCTP packets, Julian Anastasov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |