LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

回复: [PATCH net-next] ipvs: properly dereference pe in ip_vs_add_service

To: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Subject: 回复: [PATCH net-next] ipvs: properly dereference pe in ip_vs_add_service
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S . Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Hanxiao Chen (Fujitsu)" <chenhx.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 02:57:27 +0000

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> 发送时间: 2024年6月27日 1:54
> 收件人: Chen, Hanxiao<chenhx.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 抄送: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Pablo Neira Ayuso
> <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; David S . 
> Miller
> <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jakub
> Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 主题: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipvs: properly dereference pe in ip_vs_add_service
> 
> 
>       Hello,
> 
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2024, Chen Hanxiao wrote:
> 
> > Use rcu_dereference_protected to resolve sparse warning:
> >
> >   net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1471:27: warning: dereference of noderef
> expression
> >
> > Fixes: 39b972231536 ("ipvs: handle connections started by real-servers")
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhx.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
...
> > -   if (svc->pe && svc->pe->conn_out)
> > +   tmp_pe = rcu_dereference_protected(svc->pe, 1);
> > +   if (tmp_pe && tmp_pe->conn_out)
> >             atomic_inc(&ipvs->conn_out_counter);
> 
>       Alternative option would be to use 'pe' above and to move
> the RCU_INIT_POINTER and pe = NULL with their comment here.
> It is up to you to decide which option is better...
> 
Thanks for the advice.
Using pe instead of RCU dereference looks like a better choice.
v2 will come soon.

Regards,
- Chen
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>