![]() |
lvs-devel
|
To: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v2 net] ipvs: Fix estimator kthreads preferred affinity |
Cc: | Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxxx>, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, coreteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 7 Aug 2025 15:00:49 +0200 |
On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 01:28:16PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > On Tue, 29 Jul 2025, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > The estimator kthreads' affinity are defined by sysctl overwritten > > preferences and applied through a plain call to the scheduler's affinity > > API. > > > > However since the introduction of managed kthreads preferred affinity, > > such a practice shortcuts the kthreads core code which eventually > > overwrites the target to the default unbound affinity. > > > > Fix this with using the appropriate kthread's API. > > > > Fixes: d1a89197589c ("kthread: Default affine kthread to its preferred NUMA > > node") > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Looks good to me for the nf tree, thanks! > > Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> For the record: Apologies, I will include this patch in the next pull request. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Next by Date: | [PATCH] net/netfilter/ipvs: Fix data-race in ip_vs_add_service / ip_vs_out_hook, Zhang Tengfei |
---|---|
Next by Thread: | [PATCH] net/netfilter/ipvs: Fix data-race in ip_vs_add_service / ip_vs_out_hook, Zhang Tengfei |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |