|
Hello,
On Thu, 23 Oct 2025, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Change the old hlist_bl_first_rcu to hlist_bl_first_rcu_dereference
> > to indicate that it is a RCU dereference.
> >
> > Add hlist_bl_next_rcu and hlist_bl_first_rcu to use RCU pointers
> > and use them to fix sparse warnings.
> >
> > Add hlist_bl_for_each_entry_continue_rcu.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/rculist_bl.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> Are the RCU maintainers OK with this?
> An explicit Ack or RvB would be good to have.
Paul McKenney requested on 15 Aug 2023 some changes
for 1st version:
https://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-devel/2023-08/msg00044.html
And they are now present in v2+:
https://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-devel/2023-08/msg00057.html
So, the RCU change is expected to be ack-ed after
the other patches are accepted. I'm also expecting review and
ack from Simon, so that we can finally include the patchset
to -next...
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|
