|
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999 g4165217@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hello,
> I have test vs-0.8 with 2 server (with local node, tunneling feature,
> weighted round robin)
> and I set it up as this...
>
> *** Server 1 (load balancer + web server)
> - IP add. = 192.168.0.2
> - virtual IP eth0:0 = 192.168.0.1
> echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.192 arp up
> ippfvsadm -A -t 192.168.0.1:80 -R 192.168.0.2 -w 1
> ippfvsadm -A -t 192.168.0.1:80 -R 192.168.0.3 -w 1
> ifconfig tunl0 192.168.0.1 up
>
> *** Server 2 (web server)
> - IP add. = 192.168.0.3
> ifconfig tunl0 192.168.0.1 up
>
> I test it with webstone on the other machine ... yep, it work ... but
> the load is not well balance (server 1 's load is 40, server 2 is 0.2)
> ... and the webstone result is too lower than 1 server (170 Connections
> /s compare to 600+ Connections /s) ... I can't figure out why it's too
> low ... but when I run "ifconfig" it show that the tunnel interface on
> server 2 is never used ( TX:0 RX:0 )?
I don't know why the tunnel interface on server 2 has never got any
packets. There must be something wrong.
Please send me the output of 'ippfvsadm -L' and 'ifconfig' on the server 1
and the output of 'ifconfig' on the server 2, maybe I can help.
You can make your configuration simple to diagnosis, for example the
server 1 can be configured as follows:
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
ippfvsadm -A -t 192.168.0.2:80 -R 127.0.0.1 -w 2
ippfvsadm -A -t 192.168.0.2:80 -R 192.168.0.3 -w 3
>
> Regards,
> Nartpong.
>
|
