|
Hi,
I'm in the process of setting up a test cluster of squid based proxy
caches load balanced using LVS, and as a test have set up a test cluster
using VS-NAT, and things seem to be working _very_ nicely indeed. (Once I
twigged that the problem with the setup I had was with the masquerading
setup and nothing to do with LVS :-)
I'm next going to try changing this set up to a VS-TUN style setup since
in our real production environment this would be a very useful/elegant
solution to a number of problems. Basically what would be very useful is
if anyone could tell me of any gotcha's they know of in doing this - I
already know the obvious one - to have LVS on all the servers, unlike
VS-NAT :-)
(*) An eg gotcha for VS-NAT would be: that if masquarding isn't set up
right VS-NAT doesn't work right.
Michael.
--
National & Local Web Cache Support R: G117
Manchester Computing T: 0161 275 7195
University of Manchester F: 0161 275 6040
Manchester UK M13 9PL M: Michael.Sparks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"We have thousands of such caches, and only a few of us know them all.
And when we have enough - we shall change the face the face of Arrakis"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
