Joseph Mack wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Terry Lorrah wrote:
>
> > Has anyone tried using the dummy interface rather than the loopback?
>
> Have tried all combinations of 2.2.x/2.0.36 servers/directors and
> VS-TUN/VS-DR and it works as a replacement for lo or tunl0 in most if not
> all cases. The list is part of the HOWTO I'm working on (which is at home
> right now) and will be coming out shortly. I think the only one that
> mightn't work is as a replacement for tunl0 on a 2.2.x realserver in
> VS-TUN mode (but I'm not sure)
>
Here is a trick to replace tunl0 with dummy0 device.
Enable the Tunneling protocol in the kernel and configure
to an unusable private IP address on the tunl0 device to
load the IP Tunneling protocol. Finally, configure the
VIP address on the dummy0 device.
Wensong
> Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|