|
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Patrick Kormann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I hope this is not off-topic.
> We have a 'cluster' of 4 proxy servers. I'm now trying to combine them using
> ipvs with direct routing. As the 'real servers' are using Kernel 2.2.13, I
> have the problem described on the linuxvirtualserver homepage: The proxies
> answers arp requests to the lo:0 IP, instead of letting the ipvs server
> answer them.
> I applied the arpfix-2213-1.diff patch to the kernels of the proxies and set
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/lo/arp_invisible (or something very close to that :)
> ) to 1, but still the proxies seem to answer the arp request. If I don't
> configure the ipvs server at all and do a ping to the 'virtual' IP, I have
> the MAC Adress of one of the proxies in my arp table, not the one of the
> ipvs server. the oterh patch from the virtualserver.org homepage didn't work
> at all, it broke the net-connetion of the proxies. Maybe they stopped ARPing
> at all.
May be this is not in the docs but it is required to enable the
feature using:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/arp_invisible
Now you can specify which interface to hide:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/lo/arp_invisible
Regards,
Julian Anastasov
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
