Re: Using LVS for WWW flow control ?

[Emmanuel Anne <emanne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Hmm. I like this - I take it server 1 would provide the main service
> that's intensive somehow on the server, whereas server 2 just serves a
> page saying "too busy now, please try again Real Soon" ?

Yes, but you forgot the persistant connections...
If the connected clients keep on getting "try later", it can become very
tiresome for them !


----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx