|
On 2000-01-19T15:21:47,
"Peter Koch" <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> In the mailing lists I subscribe to, they normally put the prefix right
> at the start of the subject. so that even the re: follows it, eg:
The mailing list software can't do that. It already does a best effort at
this, it tries quite hard to surpress multiple entries. (Leading to cascaded
Re:'s since the MUA doesn't ignore the [lvs-users] prefix when replying and
thus doesn't merge the "Re:"s)
It does open a can of worms to have the mailing list software mess with the
subject header.
I told you it wasn't going to be nice ;)
Anyone opposed if I turn it off again?
(BTW, threading shouldn't be affected by the subject - "mutt", for example,
threads by the "In-Reply-To" header, which is much more robust)
> Also, another suggestion, is it possible to make the TO field the
> list email address so that we can reply to an email directly to the
> list.
I can mess with the Reply-To header, but that will lead to all replies
intended to be private to end up on the list too.
A proper MUA like mutt supports a "list reply" function to reply directly to
the list, or a "g" reply to reply to all parties and then just strip off the
ones you don't want to send to...
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée
--
Lars Marowsky-Brée
Network Management
teuto.net Netzdienste GmbH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
