LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Weird LVS UDP problem

To: Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Weird LVS UDP problem
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Francois Baligant <francois@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 15:47:13 +0100 (MET)
        identd (auth) protocol is no use for UDP based
        services.

Francois Baligant            * *       EuroNet Internet NV/SA
Network Operation Center   *     *     a subsidiary of France Telecom
                          *            Lozenberg 22 - B-1932 Zaventem
FB1-6BONE                *             tel: +32 2 717 17 17
francois@xxxxxxxxxxx                   fax: +32 2 717 17 77


On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Julian Anastasov wrote:

> 
>       Hello,
> 
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Francois Baligant wrote:
> 
> > 
> >     Hi!
> > 
> >     We are trying to use LVS to load-balance radius
> >     authentication and accouting request on 2 Solaris boxes.
> > 
> >     Load-balancing for port 1646 (accounting) works extremelly well.
> >     But load-balancing for 1645 (authentication) isn't load-balanced
> >     since packets only goes to the first real server added. Yes,
> >     the service is running correctly on both nodes. Yes, request
> >     are now send the load-balancer and not directly to the node
> >     (since a whole new node now get all the requests while this box
> >     wasn't even online some hours ago)
> > 
> >     Is it a problem to try to load-balance different using the
> >     same VIP ?
> > 
> 
>       Is the IDENT protocol used from the service daemon? Stop it 
> or switch to VS/NAT mode. "tcpdump -e ..." can help too.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Julian Anastasov
> 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>