|
Hello,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Joseph Mack wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, CERBA Jacques -GRE wrote:
>
> > Doe's somebody have any idea or data ?
>
> it depends :-)
>
> If you're using VS-NAT then you'll need a machine that can handle the full
> bandwidth of the expected connections. If this is T1, you won't need much
> of a machine. If it's 100Mbps you'll need more (I can saturate 100Mbps
> with a 75MHz machine). If you're running VS-DR or VS-Tun you'll need
> less horse power. Since most LVS is I/O I would suspect that SMP won't
> get you much. However if the director is doing other things too,
> then SMP might be useful
Yep, LVS in 2.2 can't use both CPUs. This is not a LVS limitation.
Probably in 2.[3-4]. If you are using the director as real server too,
SMP is recommended.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
|
